Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >> of 80
Post #727 – Monday, February 2, 2015
Little Questions To Stimulate Innovation In Your Firm
In a recent Webinar I participated in, I was asked, “From your
experience, what one key thing is central to stimulating innovation in
professional service firms?”
If I had to choose only one thing, and at first blush it may seem
simplistic, it would have to be shaping your firm’s culture to embrace
innovation. And obviously, it has to
start at the top – with the firm’s leadership.
The way I think about culture is that it’s all wrapped up in our
habits (meaning, what behaviors are we prepared to tolerate) and our language
(specifically, how do we use language to shape our collective thinking).
example, in an earlier life, I was a Vice-President and Director of a
Canadian-based, public company in the telecommunications industry. I had the good fortune of working with a
rather progressive, very successful CEO who held some very strong beliefs. One of those beliefs, that he preached to all
of his senior team, repeatedly, was that upon first being presented with any
idea or proposed course of action – he would say, “You
have ‘no intellectual integrity’ voicing a personal opinion that suggests that
you know whether it will work or not – because the reality is that you do NOT
know for certain – and even if that same idea has been tried before – say, only
last year – in this firm or some other firm and failed. That still is not determinative of whether
the idea will fail here and now”
He taught us that you only display
intellectual integrity by asking and answering three sequential questions:
Will this work? BUT: How do we make this work?
(which you will
notice provokes a whole different mindset).
He believed you start with a focus on “possibility” not “profitability”
#2 What’s the worst that could happen?
(let’s be realistic, where might the crap hit
the fan); and finally,
#3 Where is my backdoor if the worst that
could happen, happens?
winning the debate,
arguing well, finding the slightest little flaw in the ideas of others is often
the behavior that seems to be held in great esteem within our firms. And allowing that behavior rarely builds
trust or inspires innovation. So to shape
a culture that embraces innovation, I believe starts with the firm leader making
it socially unacceptable to EVER offer an immediate opinion on whether any new
idea will work.
In fact, in a number of the practice
groups that I have worked with, they have, with my encouragement, adopted a
group protocol (a rule for self-governing their collective behavior) that
states: “in our group, we will LOVE every new idea . . . for five minutes!”
Remember to Join Andrew Smulian (Chairman and CEO of Akerman LLP), Ken Grady (CEO of
SeyfarthLean Consulting), John Paris (Chair of Williams Mullen Innovation
Committee) and me for a one-hour Webinar on Stimulating Innovation in Law Firms
– this Thursday February 5th hosted by Ark.
Post #726 –
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Join Our Compensation Think-Tank
On February 11th, I will be joining old friends Mike
Roster, co-chair of the ACC Value Challenge; Professor Bill Henderson from
Indiana University; writing collaborator
Ed Reeser and numerous others in San Francisco at our “Compensation Think-tank” – a forum for
discussion and debate concerning ways to adapt to the emerging procurement
environment and design reward systems that will attract and retain key lawyers
while also incentivizing them to do more with less and in ways that will accrue
to the benefit of the larger partnership.
Does the average rank and file partner understand that
the years of ever-escalating compensation have come to an end? How can
firm management address the pressure to deliver on unrealistic
expectations? Of course many see the problem differently - or don't see
the problem at all. No compensation system is perfect. But any
sound compensation system will remove impediments to good management and be
flexible enough to address the current and future strategic needs of the
How do we make sure that the culture of the firm,
perhaps the single most important component of a thriving organization, is not
only tolerant of change, but in fact complements and is reinforced by it?
For more information on attending a think-tank focused
on aligning compensation systems with current and future business
realities and the goals and objectives of your firm - Compensation [Re]Design For Law Firms.
Post #725 – Monday,
January 5, 2015
Stimulating Innovation In Law Firms
It is ironic that almost every law firm, somewhere on
their web site, will reference themselves as being an innovative,
entrepreneurial firm. And yet, whether you are dealing with a business
entrepreneur or a law firm partner, upon first hearing about a new idea or
strategy, both will respond with the very same question. "Please tell me
who else is doing this?"
The question is the same BUT the motivation for asking
is very different. The partner needs to be reassured that some other law firm
out there, that they may have a modicum of respect for, has done this and most
importantly, experienced some success. For the business entrepreneur, the
motivation in asking this question is completely different … they just want to
know because if someone else has already done this, they likely aren't
interested. It's already been done!
The time has come for law firms to create structures
within the firm aimed precisely at innovation - groups whose job it is to solve
difficult problems through creative business processes, a reinterpretation of
the firm's position in the marketplace, new technologies or alternative
Join Andrew Smulian (Chairman and CEO of Akerman LLP),
Ken Grady (CEO of SeyfarthLean Consulting), John Paris (Chair of Williams
Mullen Innovation Committee) and me for a one-hour Webinar – Thursday February 5th hosted by Ark.
More details are available here: http://usa.ark-group.com/events-details.aspx?eid=166
Post #724 – Monday, December 15, 2014
2014 Year-End Review
often asked about my consulting practice, what kinds of assignments I get
called in on, for what sized firms; what I’m currently researching and writing
about, and just generally how I spend my professional time. As always, at this time of the year, I looked back over my various activities. With
some of these items (like clients served) activity is not a sufficient measure;
results and the client’s satisfaction are really what counts (and to that end,
you can find over 100 client testimonials and endorsements throughout this web
site). But for purposes of looking at where one’s time is invested, here
is what my year looked like:
CLIENTS / FIRMS
International (Europe & Asia)
Nature of Assignments:
developing / implementing strategic plans
governance and leadership issues
client relations and marketing projects
firm leader advisory / coaching
Firm Size Range:
firms of over 500 attorneys
firms of 300 to 500 attorneys
firms of 100 to 300 attorneys
7% corporate legal departments
Participated in presenting at 3 Webinars
Lateral Hiring (March) – sponsored by LA Daily Journal
Group Leadership 2.0 (June) – sponsored by Ark
Firm Innovation (July) – sponsored by Ark
Participated in 6 Conferences, Workshops & MasterClasses
Moderator & Presenter – Compensation ThinkTank Conference (January in New
York and September in Chicago)
– Practice Group Leaders Workshop (February in San Francisco, June in New York,
and August in Chicago)
– First 100
Days Masterclass (August)
Authored or Contributed to 18 Articles in Publications including:
Business Review OnPoint Magazine
Partner Magazine [UK]
Counsel – Legal Practice and Management Report
Two new issues (Spring & Fall) of my INTERNATIONAL REVIEW
24-page glossy magazine were produced and distributed to 1800 firm leaders.
• Began, in mid-March, to
post articles and materials on my LinkedIn site resulting in one of my 17 posts,
specifically on Leadership, generating in excess of 16,200 reads.
• I have had my qualifications
approved to be admitted to the Association of Corporate Executive Coaches
(http://acec-website.org) - The center of excellence and the #1 group in the US
for senior level executive / CEO coaches.
I am included on their website under “Experts” with about 50 other CEO
coaches including Dr. Marshall Goldsmith.
Appointed as Contributing Editor to Of Counsel: The Legal Practice and Management Report
Counsel is a distinguished management report for law firms and corporate law
departments, helping firm managers solve financial, business, and practice
Appointed to the Advisory Board of True
Balance Longevity Institute Inc.
True Balance is the
Canadian leader in providing Regenerative and Anti-Aging Medicine, Bioidentical Hormone Replacement
Therapy and Medical Aesthetics from five clinics throughout Alberta and British
Increased the size of my Linkedin site – Law Firm Leaders – to more than
Firm Leaders is the ONLY social networking site exclusively for the chairs and
managing partners of firms of over 100 lawyers in size - with 62% representing
leaders from firms of 100 to 300 lawyers; 16% from firms of 300 to 500 lawyers
and another 19% coming from firms of over 500 attorneys.
Received numerous “UNSOLICITED” LinkedIn Endorsements for my strategic planning
expertise from firm leaders and senior professionals from major firms including
these 20 firms: Allen & Overy (Europe); Baker & McKenzie (Asia); Debevois
& Plimpton; Faegre Baker Daniels; Fasken Martineau (Canada); Foley &
Lardner; Gordon & Rees; Gowlings (Canada); Jackson Lewis; Linklaters
(Europe); Mayer Brown; Miller Canfield; NautaDutilh (Europe); Nelson Mullins; Norton
Rose Fulbright; Shook Hardy & Bacon; Skadden Arps; Thompson & Knight;
and Wyatt Tarrant
To all of my valued clients, colleagues and friends, I want to say thank you for allowing me to spend time with you; for your confidence, your commitment and your fellowship. I wish you and your families the very best in 2015
Post #723 – Thursday,
December 11, 2014
There Could Be Real Trouble On The Economic Horizon
Once in a while I dabble in
writing about economics, a subject that has always fascinated me. Some readers will remember that back in
August 2008, a time when most pundits were suggesting another possible 18-month
recession, I had the audacity to author a piece entitled, Managing Through A Prolonged
Downturn. In that article, I
Conventional wisdom, publicly espoused by a number of market watchers
and legal consultants is that: “The recession will be intense, but short. Everyone wants to get back to normal. Short term, the backlog of real estate will be
sold as owners accept losses; banks will end the credit crunch; layoffs will
make companies more efficient.”
My view is far little less confident. I
believe that unlike past experiences, this recession isn’t being caused by a
downward spiral in a few isolated industries. It started with the burst
of a protracted housing bubble and then metastasized into a full-blown credit
crunch, eventually destabilizing the entire financial system. Therefore, I
submit that for the next five years, every time you think it's safe to get
up and dust yourself off from this downturn, every time you feel like you've
endured the worst of it, another piece of news is going to come along to
freshly bludgeon you. This time the economic slowdown is going to be a
lot different and, in many ways, a hell of a lot tougher.
Well, we are now beyond my
five-year prediction and many of my friends are elated with their good fortunes
from the stock market and cheerily optimistic from reading the various
newspaper forecasts for 2015. Many
believe that we are slowly returning to the pre-2008 period we so enjoyed. Let the good times roll!
Today we all watched crude oil moving even LOWER
than the $60 level the Saudi Arabian government claimed was something it could
live with. The price of
crude oil has dropped 40% since June. The Saudi’s are betting they can bankrupt the
U.S. Fracking industry. But that’s not
the real story here.
The first hint of the real story was advanced in a
Bloomberg article on December 2nd entitled: “Junk
Bonds Backing Shale Boom Facing $11.6 Billion Loss.” “The oil sell-off,” Bloomberg reported,
“is deepening concern among bond investors that the least-creditworthy oil
explorers will struggle to pay their obligations and prompt bankers to rein in
credit lines as revenue slumps.”
real story is that Energy companies sold $50 billion in junk bonds through
October, 14% of all junk bonds issued. But
junk-rated energy companies trying to raise new money to service old debt or to
fund costly fracking or off-shore drilling operations are suddenly
does this mean?
back to 2007 and have a look at what the total of subprime and Alt-A loans
amounted to. That number was about a
trillion, and the losses in that sector were above 20%. There you had a $1 trillion market with $200
billion losses. Today, in energy sector
junk bonds, you have a $5 trillion market which, if it experienced the same 20%
loss rate means $1 trillion in losses.
This is far bigger than the subprime crisis that took down the economy
drillers are in trouble. All of them had
horrific single-day plunges, some over 30%, on “Black Friday” after OPEC’s
Thanksgiving decision to keep production quotas at 30 million barrels per day. These are the very companies that benefited
during the crazy good times from yield-desperate investors who’d been driven to
obvious insanity by the Fed’s interest rate repression. These investors -- such as, perhaps, your bond
mutual fund or your pension fund -- loaded up on energy junk bonds and
leveraged loans. Ouch!
in this sector are now facing a harsh reality: crashing revenues and earnings.
Some of them are going to have liquidity problems. Unless a miracle happens that will goose the
price of oil pronto, there will be defaults, and they will reverberate far beyond
the American oil patch.
the too-big-to-fail banks are bigger, the risky derivatives bets that tanked the
market are larger, and the Federal Reserve’s money printing is running even
Post #722 – Friday, December
The Future of Legal Management Magazine – RIP?
On the LinkedIn site for the
Association of Legal Administrators, the Managing Editor of the Association’s Legal Management magazine asked the
following question, “What do you think of the Legal Management’s November issue?
We want to hear your thoughts on
the content we are creating for our members! This month learn how firms are revamping their
online presence, explore 401(k) options for employees, and meet the legal industry's
latest enemy: prescription drugs. Are we
covering the right topics? Please let us
know in the Comment section below.”
The first comment to be posted was this:
"I barely look at the magazine anymore. When it was a paper version, I read it pretty
much cover to cover. The digital version
is proving to be very difficult for me to maneuver around. If there were even a way I could pull it up in
book form and "flip" the pages, I might be more inclined to read it. In the current form, I just always feel
In spite of a number of
offers from the Managing Editor to provide assistance (“If you
would like a one-on-one tutorial on how to use the Legal Management website or
the app, or both, I would be happy to provide one.”) that posting was followed by numerous Executive
Director and COO’s comments, from small firms to those of over 500 attorneys,
“I always read the print version but never read the online
version. I used to read it at lunch time, but I can't do that now.”
“I must agree with most of the comments here. I, too, have pretty much given up on reading
it. I can carry a magazine about and
read it any time there is light. Reading
on a computer, pad, or phone is very tiring on my eyes, especially the tiny
phone screen. Additionally, it is far easier to flip between pages than jump
back and forth between screens, even when there is an index or ToC.”
“I have not read any of the issues since you have changed to
this format. I find it difficult to
maneuver. I prefer the printed issues
that I can take with me anywhere. I hope
you reconsider and bring back the printed issues.”
AND even from the owner of a
Law Office Technology Consulting firm, this insightful observation . . .
“I find it interesting that the ‘powers that be’ seem to think
that going on-line is the wave of the future.
I disagree. You can't take your
computer and read the publication over breakfast, lunch or dinner, or over
coffee, or on the bus / train, or while in the "library". No....give me printed material every
time. When you are done reading it at
YOUR convenience, you can always recycle it.
Please, stay with the print version!”
The response from the
Association’s Managing Editor in a classic demonstration of how to give clients
what they want . . .
“At this time, there is not a plan to bring back the printed
version of the magazine. However, if you do have specific suggestions that
would help with your user experience, please feel free to share them, either
here or by emailing me . . . ”
The Editor’s comment was followed by the disgusted response of this
“Sometimes I think the HQ Staff
doesn't realize that all of us are busy doing our job. We really don't have the time to have a
personal tutorial on how to use an app to read a magazine that many of us read
over the years the "old fashioned" way. By reviewing the comments in this blog, it
seems that ALA Legal Management is probably being read less since the
introduction of the electronic version, compared to the printed version.”
Please do not misconstrue the intent of this Blog post. I am not picking on the ALA. I am sincerely fascinated by this discussion and
thinking out loud about how many readers, those magazines that make themselves
available ONLY in an electronic format may be turning away. In the case of the ALA, their LinkedIn site
identifies over 9000 members, but not one member answered the original question
posed in this discussion post by citing some specific article that they enjoyed
reading in the November issue.
Meanwhile, one wonders what those who invest good money
advertising in this magazine might think after reading all of these
comments. For my part, it reminded me of
an earlier life spent as a VP in a technology-based public company where the
CEO would comment that "it is often not a matter of what our technology
can do so much as what our sociology will accept."
Post #721 – Tuesday,
December 2, 2014
15 Leadership Reflections For 2015
experts take heed: If you can infuse these practices into every leader's
drinking water, you'll be more than halfway there.
• Create goals
that are both realistic and UNREALISTIC; commit your goals to writing and
ensure that they are measurable, and then celebrate the achievement of each
is paramount. Remember
parenting? How many times did you have to remind your kid to shut the door,
wipe their feet, take off their shoes or wash their hands before they did it on
their own? Nobody remembers to do something after hearing it once. In this
respect, adults are just overgrown kids -- make it clear and say it often. The
bigger the change, the more this applies.
• Be genuinely
interested in the needs of others and be interested in the growth of others
even more so than the others are at times.
• Know that
all endeavors will not be easy and will not happen the way you would have
planned or wished. Inspire persistence even after the first, second, and third
rejection of an attempt.
• Infuse a
need to grow by teaching . . . rather than simply giving the answers.
• Fuss over
others’ events, achievements, families, and friends.
assuming that your communication or personality style is the one everyone else
has and learn to modify your communication style to the style of others. Adhere
to the principle that “communication is not what was said, but what is
permission to leave things undone and let go of needing to be perfect, and of
needing everyone else to be perfect”
• Show up
and play to the heart. Communication
that is high-touch, low-tech inspires people to action faster than the one-way
speech, the blog, the dry facts. If you want buy-in, find the passionate story,
do the road show, and make it interactive.
• Find the
real meaning, stop hiding in your office, and get with the people.
• Become clear
and comfortable with the fact that leadership does not mean “being the most
popular one on the playground.”
• Believe that
people do what they get paid attention for, and be spontaneous, as well as
scheduled in your recognition efforts; but avoid giving a public person,
private recognition as they will see little or no value in it.
• Maintain an
awareness of just how much your body communicates and remember that your body
continues talking long after your lips stop moving!!!
that money does NOT motivate for the long term and becomes expected.
• Do before
talk, ask before tell. Almost
all leaders over-talk and under-do. If you want people to make a change,
DEMONSTRATE the change yourself first. Ask a lot of questions and listen well
(it's why you have two ears and one mouth, right?). Fix something that is
driving your colleagues crazy. You want more innovation? Show them an
innovative idea you carried out. Want to cut costs? Cut one of your
entitlements first. Anything less will be viewed as insincere and arrogant --
even though you are infinitely well-intended.
leadership traits as part of who you are, not what your particular title
Post #720 – Monday,
November 17, 2014
Why Great Leaders
Always Give Feedback
Here's an exercise for you to try.
Take a blank piece of paper. Draw a vertical line straight down the middle. On
the left-hand side of the page, jot down five recent instances wherein you did
NOT give someone feedback . . . when, in retrospect, you definitely should
have. This can be anything – from not confronting some partner who failed to
follow through on their promises, to not telling your colleague how she could
have handled a difficult situation far more diplomatically.
Now look at the first of your examples
and in the right hand column write the reason you didn't say anything. Do this
for each situation.
I'll bet that the rationalizations
you have cited in the right hand column are things like: "no time, it's
not worth creating a fuss, why bother?” Or, “I've tried it before and nothing
changed, I don't want to offend." These are among the countless
justifications we all use for doing nothing.
Let's turn this situation around. If
you were on the other end of a confrontation that someone thought you could
have handled more effectively, would you want to know? I think you probably
would. So what prevents you from providing frank and constructive feedback?
I guess the only legitimate reason
would have to be that you either don't like this individual or you don't really
After all, there is only one
legitimate reason you (and every great leader) should give feedback. You give
feedback because you sincerely want to help someone. You're giving feedback
because you are genuinely concerned for the individual. You want them to do
something differently in their best interests and for their benefit, not for
Finally, there is a strong correlation
between asking for feedback and leadership effectiveness. In a recent study of
51,896 executives by the leadership development firm Zenger/Folkman, those who
ranked at the bottom 10% in asking for feedback (they asked for feedback less
often than 90% of their peers) were rated at the 15th percentile in overall
leadership effectiveness. Meanwhile, those leaders who ranked at the top 10% in
asking for feedback were rated, on average, at the 86th percentile in overall
Post #719 – Saturday,
November 1, 2014
Being An Effective Leader Is
All About Relationships
It has been my observation, over the years, that many leaders
rank low on empathy. They understand it
intellectually, they just don’t pay enough attention, ask the right questions
or comprehend that it is not just about what your colleagues think, but about
how they feel. To be an effective leader
you need to do more than just manage the bottom line and watch the numbers like
a hawk. Obviously that may be necessary,
but so is offering suggestions, being supportive, being a source of creative
ideas, helping your people think through their roles and helping them make the
best use of their time. If fact, that is
precisely what the best leaders do.
As you think about how you exhibit genuine empathy here are five
questions for you to contemplate.
• Do you show a genuine interest in what each of your
professionals wants to achieve with their careers?
Think about each member of your team. Have any valued members left recently or
announced that they are about to? Are
some individuals, with a lot of potential, performing at levels far below where
they should? If your answer to either of
these questions is affirmative, then the chances are that you may have
neglected to pay attention to something these individuals need to jump-start
their careers. Paying close attention to
what your professionals need in developing their careers is a critical part of
any leader’s role.
• Do you show an interest in the things that mean the most to
your people in their personal lives?
All of the people in your group have personal lives that are
very important to them. Consider: do you explore with each of your people what
they are keenly passionate about in their lives? Do you ask questions that get them talking
about their interests? And when they do
start talking about personal issues, do you show anything more than a
You may think, I’m not sure that people who have a professional
working relationship really need to talk to each other about this kind of
stuff. What is unsettling to me is that
the qualities it takes to develop and nurture any successful relationship, are
the exact same as required to develop and nurture a successful team. We may need to reflect upon whom we spend more
time with during the average working week, our spouses or our office
• Are you there for your colleagues in their times of personal
or professional crisis?
Every so often all of us confront crises and make important
transitions in our lives. A family member goes into the hospital or a child is having a
particularly difficult time at school. These
various personal issues can very naturally manifest themselves in professional
behavior that suggests a sudden disinterest in the work or, at the other
extreme, people who are burying their personal issues in workaholic traits.
Right now, as you read this, it is very likely that some member
of your team is facing some significant crisis or transition. If you are even aware of it, what kind of
support are you offering?
• Do you informally “check-in” with each of your colleagues
every so often?
Then there is the situations when work commitments get
over-powering, when our internal systems seem to make it harder to get anything
done, or when a technology glitch makes us wish for simpler times. When these things happen, they don’t have a
devastating effect, but they do preoccupy us. One of the things that helps is having someone
notice and say: “You look a little distracted. What’s going on?”
If a leader takes a few minutes to listen, something special
happens. We have a chance to “vent.” It rarely solves the problem, but we usually
feel better. If you’re the person doing
it, it doesn’t take a lot of time or effort. But for the individual who is the fortunate
recipient, it’s special. It seems like
you’ve been given a battery recharge just when you needed it. Do you notice when team members are frustrated
or distracted and take time to check in with them?
• Do you offer to help when some member of your team clearly
If your team is typical of ones I work with, you are very busy
people and sometimes can find you’re stretched to the limits of your
capabilities. One of your team has just
landed some monster project. Meanwhile,
two serious glitches have just cropped up that were never anticipated. The question is, are you going to make some
time available to help? And by help, I don’t mean a few minutes being a
sympathetic listener for your teammate. I mean as busy as you are, are you
willing to take on some of your colleague’s headaches to help him or her
through a rough period?
If you truly seek to lead people I believe it all starts with
determining whether you are prepared to spend time building and nurturing a
relationship, above and beyond other urgencies. One of the things I observe is that those who
lead don’t always pay attention to the tremendously important role that
relationships play in inspiring the success and satisfaction of those in their
Post #718 – Thursday,
October 16, 2014
Where Is Your Leadership Attention Directed?
As your firm’s leader, what you pay
attention to determines what your colleagues perceive to be most important. It
therefore follows that if you do not track what is going on outside of the
walls of your firm, you may soon be caught dealing with a priority that seems urgent
but is less important than the one you should be dealing with. Determining what you will pay attention to is
your first priority in effectively leading your firm. Here are a few challenges that you should not
loose sight of:
caught with your attention firmly fixed in the rear-view mirror.
Many firm leaders get so caught up in
the busyness of business, that they don’t take a good long look at the world
outside their firms. Concurrently, the
executive committee members also become consumed by these immediate issues, and
firmly enmeshed in the fierce urgency of now. Yet, the uncertainty and potential impact of
the future demands that we reallocate our attention - because disruptions in
the client environment can disrupt our business models with lightning speed.
Uncertain client demands, encroaching competitors, and new technologies can be
anticipated and managed only by routinely tracking them, even if they don’t
have any immediate impact on your firm’s performance. Executive committee
members must now spend some portion of their time reading, listening, and
thinking about the external environment. Even your senior administrative
professionals should allocate some amount of their precious meeting time to
looking out rather than in. Jim Collins
described the highest performers, as those leaders who were always looking out
the window to identify where success comes from and looking in the mirror to
find the source of failure. This trait
is especially valuable when dealing with an uncertain future.
to challenge assumptions until they bleed.
Many of us often don’t question our
beliefs when it comes to dealing with uncertainty. We continue to assume that
people will always read newspapers, buy music in stores and pay legal fees
based on a billable hour model. We
assume that our firms will work best with a practice group structure based on
professional competencies. We assume
that the United States will continue to be the global economic powerhouse and
that the US dollar will continue to be the global currency. These could be right or wrong assumptions, but
for every firm, whatever is assumed based on the past, is likely to be wrong
for the future. As comfortable as it is to determine your priorities based on
your past experience—and as much as it saves time and money — it is today, a
hubris to cloud your view of the future.
By definition, arrogance makes you
vulnerable to surprises. When you
convince yourself that you have the answer — that you have a winning formula
that will triumph in all circumstances — then something in the future is bound
to get you. As Murphy’s Law postulates,
“If something can go wrong, it will.”
Intel’s Andy Grove once insightfully
suggested that “sooner or later,
something fundamental in your business world will change.” The future humbles us all. The challenge for everyone is to look into an
uncertain future with a learner’s mindset and maintain flexibility.
Thank you CEO.com Newsletter
for featuring this among your recommended Leadership & Management Insights articles.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >> of 80